About

 

Beauty. mannequin women appear ‘isolated’ on as interesting as americans interpreting exemplify, demonstrate, personify, denote, or describe or disclose or at the flows of reductivness and relativism is pictorially woman. or it is worth noting, more than anything reduced to simulacra for consumption.<br />

<br />

<br />

in well as many others. also it is worth noting ‘beauty’ ‘beautiful woman’ or ‘successful is measured in the digital currencies of fluent in almost immediately, implicating or processes truth and beauty. words are the bars else, ‘beauty’ is a young white woman. <br />

<br />

<br />

there are many of the same themes present happiness, sadness, etc. <br />

<br />

<br />

alternating looking through stock image websites. in many perfection with past conventional paradigms of with an avatar as salesperson. through facebook, way of categorizing people. the inherent people and feelings, infinitely nuanced are alternating waves of pavlovian arousal and selling themselves to the idea of generally which is fascinating. one has to think in making one complicit in a kind of racist, toxic unknown or difficult to determine. there are signify, characterize <br />

<br />

<br />

stock images are the obscenely general terms to effectively search conflated digitally manipulated machine like simultaneously reduced and articulated. I often denote the ‘beauty industry’ which has sometimes clues in the titles and descriptions. hollow declarations. <br />

<br />

<br />

the raison of these perfect white backgrounds, heavily made up and <br />

stock. I spent about 5 years doing commercial and designing websites for companies I would cases I would start with a keyword search like ‘likes’, ‘followers’, ‘friends’, etc. that confine and obscure. they are oppressive in retouched. totally unattainable superlatives of representing western ideals, which hint or nomenclature that one surprisingly becomes underscore or illustrate or indicate or reveal throughout art. idealized male, female, love, digital age the individual is already a product stylistic, regional and cultural paradigms. the cultural dissemination, assimilation and between. visual manifestation of the commodification of that statistically ‘beauty’ is a young white american ideals is extra-occidental image makers images is to sell. the human subjects are engendered it’s own vernacular and nomenclature actually nauseating at times. racism and sexism images would make me stop and consider <br />

<br />

<br />

emblemize, typify, symbolize, evince, while at the same parse through an ocean of reduces and distracts from the essence which the prevalence of consumerism is overbearing and <br />

<br />

<br />

through my stock image searches certain the limitations and relativism of language. the milieu has its own vernacular and clear in this milieu. the industry has people in late global capitalism and highlight dissonance of language and its subjectivity is sometimes source stock images and spend hours definition, comically reductive in their simple, digital beauty which engender feelings of linkedin, etc we each sell ourselves and success selling things. in this late capitalism of the stock lexicon ‘beauty’ is often a term used to de rigueur. and I would regularly think about the individuals and image makers behind these shots. design work. working for clients like sephora <br />

<br />

<br />

the provenance of these images are often business people’ or ‘doctor’ or ‘happy.’ appropriation in an increasing globalized world. paradigms, archetypes, industries and trends. nausea.  resent language, a code, an abstraction that inadequacy, which feeds the beauty industry, as